Zenography
Zenography
  • 325
  • 7 245 576

Відео

Super SHARP And Super CHEAP!Super SHARP And Super CHEAP!
Super SHARP And Super CHEAP!
Переглядів 3 тис.2 дні тому
The Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.7 is the CHEAPEST big name 50mm f1.7 lens you can buy today. It gives incredible Konica colours, it's amazingly sharp, it gives fantastic background blur and it's cheaper then ALL its competitors from Nikon, Canon, Olympus and Pentax. How can a lens this good be this cheap? Check out the video for the best bargain in 50mm vintage lenses today. If you like the content ...
I Dropped A 70 Year Old Camera On CONCRETE!I Dropped A 70 Year Old Camera On CONCRETE!
I Dropped A 70 Year Old Camera On CONCRETE!
Переглядів 3,1 тис.9 днів тому
Find out what happened when I dropped my Rolleiflex onto solid concrete. Will it ever shoot again? I have never dropped a camera before, but I guess there's always a first time. Will it live to shoot again, or is this the end of the road? If you like the content on this channel, why not become a patron at www.patreon.com/Zenography?fan_landing=true Thanks for watching!
Seven LONG Vintage Lenses - FOR PEANUTS!Seven LONG Vintage Lenses - FOR PEANUTS!
Seven LONG Vintage Lenses - FOR PEANUTS!
Переглядів 4,5 тис.16 днів тому
These 200mm and 300mm lenses are among the cheapest vintage lenses you can buy today. Priced from about £40 to £60, these high grade optics offer plenty of bang for your buck! There are seven lenses here today, from Canon, Olympus, Vivitar, Canon, Miranda, Sirius and Ohnar. They all make fantastic images, with a big bucketful of vintage charm. I find them great for portraits, street portraits, ...
All The Glass You Need, FROM £15!All The Glass You Need, FROM £15!
All The Glass You Need, FROM £15!
Переглядів 6 тис.23 дні тому
High quality vintage lenses can still be found from around £15, and here are seven of the nicest from Vivitar, Cosina, Sigma and Hanimex. These are some incredible bargains. Each one will make fantastic images filled with character and quirks, in a way no modern lens can match, and many will equal, and sometimes exceed, the quality of big name lenses from Canon, Nikon and Olympus. What's more i...
M42 Mirror Lens! TT Artisan 250mm f5.6 - With Doughnuts!M42 Mirror Lens! TT Artisan 250mm f5.6 - With Doughnuts!
M42 Mirror Lens! TT Artisan 250mm f5.6 - With Doughnuts!
Переглядів 5 тис.Місяць тому
The new 250mm f5.6 M42 mirror lens from TT Artisan is a stunner. It's very sharp, very long and it makes background blur like you've never seen! Its M42 mount means it will mount to any digital mirrorless camera, with an M42 adaptor, and to any M42 film camera too! Its very small and light too so it won't weigh you down - this is a lens you can carry all day long without strain or inconvenience...
Sigma f2.8 90mm - Incredible Macro/Portrait Bargain!Sigma f2.8 90mm - Incredible Macro/Portrait Bargain!
Sigma f2.8 90mm - Incredible Macro/Portrait Bargain!
Переглядів 4,3 тис.Місяць тому
This is one of the best kept secrets in vintage lenses right now. It's the cheapest 90mm macro lens I could find. It's incredibly sharp, it shoots macro images and its 90mm focal length means it makes LOADS of background blur too. It's small, light and compact and it's REALLY cheap too. Check out the video to see what it can do! If you like the content on this channel, why not become a patron a...
Film Beats Digital - OR DOES IT??Film Beats Digital - OR DOES IT??
Film Beats Digital - OR DOES IT??
Переглядів 3,7 тис.Місяць тому
Here is everything I love AND hate about digital and film photography, in 24 joy - and sorrow - filled minutes! I love the ease of digital photography, but sometimes it feels a little TOO easy! I love its speed, but sometimes it feels a little too detached. I love the magic of film photography, but sometimes it's just a little too much of a faff! I love the way it slows you down, but sometimes ...
Learning Photography In The '70s!Learning Photography In The '70s!
Learning Photography In The '70s!
Переглядів 3,2 тис.Місяць тому
Come with me on a journey back in time. It's 1978 and I have a Fed 4 rangefinder in my hand with which to learn photography. It was film all the way in those days - it was expensive and I was encouraged not to waste any! I had one camera and one lens for a while, but soon branched out into SLR cameras, and later into digital mirrorless cameras too. Politics was in turmoil in those days and ther...
The Best CHEAP Vintage Lenses, From £20 - £40!The Best CHEAP Vintage Lenses, From £20 - £40!
The Best CHEAP Vintage Lenses, From £20 - £40!
Переглядів 5 тис.Місяць тому
These are the cheapest high quality vintage lenses you can buy today. At prices between £20 - £40 can you afford to ignore them? There are no compromises here - each of these lenses gives outstanding image quality. Each is built from metal, with no plastic in sight. They've lasted up to 50 years, and they'll last for a good many more too. Who says you need to spend big to find top quality lense...
Pergear 25mm f1.7 ReviewPergear 25mm f1.7 Review
Pergear 25mm f1.7 Review
Переглядів 4,4 тис.2 місяці тому
This little 25mm lens from Pergear is a lovely little optic for APS-C cameras, that has something of a dual personality. It can make images like a modern lens, but it can give vintage style images too. It's very small, light and portable and won't weigh you down, and it has some very interesting background blur too! Check out what it can do in the video! Buy this lens here: UK Amz 8% off, X69MU...
The One Camera To Rule Them All!The One Camera To Rule Them All!
The One Camera To Rule Them All!
Переглядів 10 тис.2 місяці тому
If I could only use one film camera from now and ever after, which one would it be? A Nikon, Canon or Olympus SLR? A nice old Praktica with M42 mount? Perhaps a 1930s Leica rangefinder, or one of the FSU Leica derived cameras? Find out, in today's exciting instalment! Check out the episode, if you wish to be enlightened! To support this channel on Patreon please go to: www.patreon.com/Zenograph...
Super Sharp, Super Cheap, Super Swirly!Super Sharp, Super Cheap, Super Swirly!
Super Sharp, Super Cheap, Super Swirly!
Переглядів 9 тис.2 місяці тому
The TT Artisan 56mm f1.8 is a super sharp, medium long lens for APS-C cameras. It has great colour and its background blur, while soft like many modern lenses, hides something of a surprise. This lens must have some vintage DNA somewhere in its helicoids because it can produce a distinctly vintage effect when shot wide open. It's a great portrait lens, a great fun lens and a great everyday walk...
DO THIS To Bring New Life To Your Images!DO THIS To Bring New Life To Your Images!
DO THIS To Bring New Life To Your Images!
Переглядів 3,7 тис.2 місяці тому
The square format is fascinating to explore and gives a whole new dimension to photography. It encourages a different way of shooting, and a new way of seeing. Refresh your photography by shooting square, and give your images a new style. Don't be there, be square! Check out the video for more! To support this channel on Patreon please go to: www.patreon.com/Zenography?fan_landing=true Thanks f...
The One Lens To Rule Them All!The One Lens To Rule Them All!
The One Lens To Rule Them All!
Переглядів 21 тис.2 місяці тому
If I could only use ONE lens, from now and forever more, which one would it be? Jupiter? Minolta? Olympus? Canon? Nikon? Or something more obscure? Find out, in today's exciting instalment! Check out the episode, if you wish to be enlightened. To support this channel on Patreon please go to: www.patreon.com/Zenography?fan_landing=true Thanks for watching!
The Helios 44 Shoots HOLLYWOOD BLOCKBUSTERS!The Helios 44 Shoots HOLLYWOOD BLOCKBUSTERS!
The Helios 44 Shoots HOLLYWOOD BLOCKBUSTERS!
Переглядів 8 тис.3 місяці тому
This $50 vintage lens, and other vintage lenses, have recently been used to shoot DUNE Part 2! Selected for its extraordinary character, this lens can do what modern lenses can't, and its quallities are now becoming appreciated by professional photographers and cinematographers. The same is true of other cheap vintage lenses too, and many such as the Jupiter 8, Jupiter 9 and the Tair, Mir and H...

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @federicobraida
    @federicobraida День тому

    Om1 Is clearly the best

  • @Mme.Swisstella
    @Mme.Swisstella День тому

    That vivitar lens is in fact made by Bauer.

  • @perin99
    @perin99 День тому

    I came to the same conclusion as you. I believed the hype and was disappointed when I bought one of my own. It isn't a bad lens at all but it isn't anything special either.

  • @neilfoddering921
    @neilfoddering921 День тому

    The glass on your Nikon appears to have a yellow cast in the video. Is it one of the ones which uses radioactive glass? I recently bought a Nikkor-s 1.4 which is distinctly yellow from the radioactive glass, and I’ve been debating whether to treat it with UV to get rid of the yellowing, or to keep it as-is. I’m wondering whether your lens is similar, and if so, whether this is the reason for the distinctive colour palate.

  • @jameswburke
    @jameswburke День тому

    If you want sharpness, I'd recommend a Pentax 50mm f1.7 SMC lens. It came as a kit lens with the Pentax ME Super. It is amazingly sharp, tiny, but more importantly in my view, gives a very 3D image. It's overlooked by vintage collectors / users and so it's still cheap and often comes with a camera attached. I've used one since 1981. The Pentax f4 50mm Macro is another very sharp lens if you don't mind shooting at f4 max.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      The f4 macro is astonishingly sharp and was known for a while as the sharpest lens in the world! I'll look out for the 50 1.7 - it seems to have slipped the net!

  • @Tom-yd5lg
    @Tom-yd5lg День тому

    Hi Nigel, I'm a german photographer and i bought an Electro 35 GSM. I love this Kamera so much, and i like your English languange, that you use in this Video.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      Thanks man, enjoy the electro, I haven't used mine much recently - must take it out for a spin soon!

  • @DominikMarczuk
    @DominikMarczuk День тому

    It would be nice to have some proper sharpness tests done on many samples. I know my Konica is sharper than both my Pancolar and my Oly. Whether that's the norm, I don't know, but the results are different to yours. Also, all of these lenses have variants, which might have some variations in coating quality and perhaps even optical formula updates.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      The difference between the most capable lenses in this class is not great and could well be down to sample variation or other factors. They're certainly all very nice optics, for sure.

  • @jan-martinulvag1953
    @jan-martinulvag1953 День тому

    You should buy and sell lenses. Maybe

  • @kruno7150
    @kruno7150 День тому

    If the sharpness is the priority, I go with modern (and, usually AF) lenses. Hexanon is great lens but somehow boring, name one characteristic and you'll find other lens doing it (somehow) better, except the price, at the moment you cannot beat that (excluding the 3rd party ones) :)

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      They're certainly cheaper than a good many others, that's for sure.

    • @kruno7150
      @kruno7150 День тому

      @@zenography7923 yup! there is no excuse not to own one :) but there is few one which compete in great but cheap 50mm - Pentacon 50mm f1.8 and XR Rikenon 50mm f2 (tomioka , plain XR one, not the P, L, S versions). On the other hand, i cannot think of any 40mm that can compete with Hexanon 40mm f1.8 in terms of performance and price

  • @MartinV.
    @MartinV. День тому

    Great Video

  • @nicusorapostol
    @nicusorapostol День тому

    I hope if it Will be possible considering making an episode about helios 81h another Russian 52mm f2 said by some to be a hidden gem I would like to see and hear your opinion, thank you

  • @wendysburgers4326
    @wendysburgers4326 День тому

    Is this Radioactive Thorium?

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      As far as I can determine this Konica lens is not radioactive, see camerapedia.fandom.com/wiki/Radioactive_lenses and similar pages.

  • @Robthevampire666
    @Robthevampire666 День тому

    Hi Nigel the Japanese do not have a Navy or any military force their constitution forbids it instead they have the Japan Self-Defence Forces (JSDF) a small maritime force is retained within that. I agree the CZJ is king and you don't look like Ozzy

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      Ah, I didn't realise that. I guess it must have been jsdf or some such. And I really don't mind being compared to Ozzy at all!

  • @stevocem
    @stevocem День тому

    According to my tests, Zuiko 50 1.8 is the sharpest in the category, a bit sharper even than the Contax Zeiss 50 1.7! Konica is average in the category. Pancolar is sharper too.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      Interesting, thanks. All these lenses are pretty nice, the difference between them being pretty minor and could easily be due to sample variation, or just the processes of time I guess. Thanks for looking in.

    • @stevocem
      @stevocem День тому

      @@zenography7923 Always a pleasure. I appreciate your contribution a lot.

  • @bigshooter461
    @bigshooter461 День тому

    i really like this 50mm f1.7 lens, There are 2 versions , I have nice copies of both. 1 is said to be sharper ( the LATER version supposedly ) I haven't tested this to see the difference. The older version 1973-76' is heavier with longer focus throw and closer minimum focus distance of just under the marking of .45 meters the newer focussess down to just under the mark of .55 meters and has a slimer barrel. The lens in your video looks like the one that is preferred by the afficinatos. aside from the close focus distance markings without the other lens to compare size and weight with you van tell witch version you have from how many clicks you have on the aperture ring, The early lens has half stop clicks 13 in total counting from f16 to f1,7 excluding the A setting Whereas the newer version only has 7 counting f16 through to f1.7 , There are a few Konica lenses I appreciate quite a bit, their glass, coatings and quality are fantastic. in the 50 f1.7 range I also very much like the newer plastic Minolta 50mm f1.7 its a bit of a surprise too for a kit lens. Maybe not quite as sharp, maybe just as, hard to say, again I have never tested I just really enjoy it when I shoot it, fantastic colours too. outstanding to be honest, compared to Nikon's 50mm f1.8 "Pancake" e series which I know people really like. You can really see the difference it sharpness and clarity when zooming for critical focus on mirrorless cameras like the a7, which I have come to learn you also shoot. While the a7 pales in comparison to all the newest tech available from Sony it is the most versatile and efficient Camera in my vintage collection for mounting everything, It is my lens test mule, but still make great images, but I digress... I also have lots of love for Pentax Glass 50 f1.4 both 7 and 8 ellement versions, 55mm f1.8 the stellar *50mm f1.7 A lens as well as the f2 as well lots of others both M42 and PK mount. I do enjoy the 50mm f1.4 Konica but might prefer the 57mm f1.4. In that range I also really love the Rokkor PF 58mm f1.4 , and have some love as well for the 55mm f1.7. You mentioned the the 40mm f1.8 I have to agree that is a fantastic lens as well I find the focal falloff remains clean and colours and contrast are really good, it is a really nice walk around focal length for the street. I have yet to acquire a CZJ it has been on my mental list. Curious if you have any love for wide zooms, I recently picked up an 18-28mm f4-f4.5 Pheonix/Samyang zoom on a Pentax PK mount. I really love the perspective haven't decided yet if it is sharp enough but I love to look through it.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      I agree, that Minolta f2 lens is very nice indeed but as you say, not quite as sharp as those here. I agree about the Nikon e series 50 too - it's capable but no more so than many others, and a good deal less than some. I think all four lenses in this video stand head and shoulders above it, in fact.

    • @bigshooter461
      @bigshooter461 День тому

      @@zenography7923 Sorry for the long comment, once I get on a roll with a couple coffees in me I could talk lenses for days. It was nice finding your chanell. I've been revisiting 3rd party glass given the ability to critical focus with the a7., I can usually tell right away looking through the evf, some of these lenses are surprising.

  • @sclogse1
    @sclogse1 2 дні тому

    Something to consider with vintage is when you use an adapter what the furthest distance is it will focus. It might only be 15 feet.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      You mean on a crop sensor camera? That would decrease effective minimum focus distance I guess.

  • @sputumtube
    @sputumtube 2 дні тому

    Just an idea for a future video - why don't you showcase some of your own images? I'd love to see them.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      I did that a little while back but it wasn't very popular, I'll re-visit sometime soon though.

    • @sputumtube
      @sputumtube День тому

      @@zenography7923 Really? I must have missed that. I'll have a look through your channel's archive. Thanks for the info.

  • @erichbrunner6157
    @erichbrunner6157 2 дні тому

    Maybe I was a bit hasty. You do talk about the color and the saturation and all the things that makes these lenses different from each other and different from a modern lens.

  • @erichbrunner6157
    @erichbrunner6157 2 дні тому

    You are arguing minutia here. I own all three and I know that they are all sharp. The real difference is how they feel and the actual images. Having said that, I think I like them all. What impresses me is that they all three of them, have the character that we love so much in vintage lenses. If ultimate sharpness is all you are worried about , then get a modern lens for your Nikon Z. They are probably all sharper than the vintage lenses, especially wide open. Sharpness is not the defining characteristic of vintage lenses. Thanks for the comparison. You always give it your best and we will appreciate that and keep on coming back for more. Cheers.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      These lenses are all pretty nice so yes, I guess we are discussing minutiae in that the differences between them are pretty minor. But for ultimate sharpness, agreed, get a modern lens!

  • @bri_v
    @bri_v 2 дні тому

    Is the Zeiss Jena 35mm f/2.4 Flektogon in the clear? Don't see anything specifically saying they're radioactive, but other Zeiss Jenas are on the list...

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      As I understand it, the Flek 35 is not radioactive. See camerapedia.fandom.com/wiki/Radioactive_lenses and similar sites for more info.

    • @bri_v
      @bri_v День тому

      @@zenography7923 Thank you!

  • @rdtstudios
    @rdtstudios 2 дні тому

    I think the Helios is very sharp too

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      It can be pretty sharp, but the Helios is essentially a 1930s lens and these are all much later. The Helios is one of my favourites, but I think these are all significantly sharper wide open. Stop down to f8 or so and it would probably be difficult to put a hair between any of them!

    • @rdtstudios
      @rdtstudios 19 годин тому

      @@zenography7923 it depends the the model too I got a later model which is sharper than the older models

  • @bri_v
    @bri_v 2 дні тому

    Wow! Glad you were able to get it patched up, the images have SO much character to them

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      It's now back on top form, and has benefitted from a cla in the process!

  • @Steve-GM0HUU
    @Steve-GM0HUU 2 дні тому

    👍Thanks for video. I recently tried an Olympus MIJ 50mm f1.8 on my Sony A7 and was very impressed with the results. Only gripe is that minumum focus is only 0.45m. I ordered some extentions tubes and will give them a try soon.

  • @heisholt79
    @heisholt79 2 дні тому

    I have this lens from my grandfather. Great hearing you have good things to say about it, as I have search UA-cam before without finding proper reviews. I use it with my X-t3 and have taken maybe my favorite picture with it. Love your show. Keep up the good work 🙂

  • @richardbukowski3300
    @richardbukowski3300 2 дні тому

    The Takumar 55mm F2 has beautiful colors. It's supposed to be the same as the 1.8, which I have, but I find the F2 is a bit more magical. Could be sample variation.

    • @Renegade1127
      @Renegade1127 День тому

      The super-tak 55/2 and 55/1.8 are optically identical. For some reason Asahi decided to lock off the 1.8 aperture, limiting it to 2.0 - possibly a bit soft at 1.8? Unless it was a cheap/easy way to have 2 x 55mm lenses in the line-up.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      As I understand it, they're the same lens, but in f2 guise would presumably be a little sharper? Whatever the case it's a great little lens - enjoy!

  • @selkiemaine
    @selkiemaine 2 дні тому

    It's frustrating to me - there are so many excellent choices, and while they differ, the differences are often quite subtle. Upon realizing that I had about a dozen choices in the 40-58mm range, I decided to just use the darn things, rather than buying more! The truth is I love just about every one of them. When I put a lens on the camera, I want to play to its strength, whatever that is, and doing so is extremely pleasing. In the end, I think I'm going to concentrate on my M42 and FD lenses - mostly because I adapt M42 to FD, and can use any of them on my Canon SLR bodies as well as my mirrorless. There is always something just a bit extra-nice about getting a truly lovely image out of a lens that's 40-60 years old. I just have to stop lusting after ALL of them!

  • @parranoic
    @parranoic 2 дні тому

    I think they were saying that about the 40mm 1.8. That one at f2.8 and lower is really sharp

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      I think the 40 1.8 is their nicest lens - really quite something.

  • @StitchTheOtter
    @StitchTheOtter 2 дні тому

    Have you tried the Meyer Primoplan 58mm f1.9 before? Out of 50+ Vintage 50mm lenes that I´ve tested, it got the best blur and glow in my opinion. Sharpness and Abberation wise i think the (Rodenstock) Edixagon 50mm f2.0 is my sharpest Vintage lens (close to the center), but sadly very rare, dark and soft corners.

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      I'll look out for the Primoplan, thanks for the tip!

    • @StitchTheOtter
      @StitchTheOtter 13 годин тому

      @@zenography7923 its quite hard to find them in good condition. All the ones that I got, got some kind of flaw, like Helicoid stickyness. And every single one needed an internal and external cleaning.

  • @charleslawrence7327
    @charleslawrence7327 2 дні тому

    💯

  • @1956jude
    @1956jude 2 дні тому

    Nigel, thanks for the video. I have a Konica 45mm 1.8 that someone removed from a rangefinder camera, manufactured a back for it on a 3D printer and added an adapter. I thought that was pretty cool and had to buy it (on Etsy). Have not spent much time with it yet. See you next week.

    • @Renegade1127
      @Renegade1127 День тому

      Etsy seller Vintageglas ?

    • @1956jude
      @1956jude День тому

      @@Renegade1127 that sounds familiar. It was a few months ago. Guy from Germany?

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      That sounds like a cool lens, enjoy!

    • @Renegade1127
      @Renegade1127 День тому

      @@1956jude His name is Bernd, based in Aachen. I have a Novar Anastigmat 75mm f4.5 (triplet) with 3d printed M42 mount.

    • @1956jude
      @1956jude День тому

      @@Renegade1127 that's the guy!

  • @scrptwic
    @scrptwic 2 дні тому

    Nigel Instead of buying a new Pentax 17 film camera I decided to recondition my Pentax Spotamatic it needed new light Seals and a mirror bumper. My favorite 50mm lens is the Takumar 50mm1.4 radioactive lens and agree the Pentax 1.7 is no slouch either

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      The 17 looks like a nice camera in and of itself, but your spotmatic is, in every important regard, a better camera. Enjoy!

  • @Emdope1
    @Emdope1 2 дні тому

    As to the lenses and their sharpness - you are forgetting very important thing - some older series vary in terms of quality, some issues might have happened also in the production of a certain line of lenses. It is a well known fact that even if you have the same type of lens from the same manufacturer, it might happen that each of them may give you slightly different results. And let's not forget that it may also depend on how the lens was used, if it was dropped, kept in good condition, if it doesn't have a fungus etc. But of course, even if everything is fine, it still can vary. This is just how it is. It may not be different by far, but even slight differences sometimes decide whether it will deliver the image you want, or not. Btw - great videos.👍 You made me want to try the Helios 44m (got two - 44m and 44m4). I used it with m42-FD adapter on Canon A-1. And as a matter of fact 44m is sharper - at least the one that I got😉

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      Variation in manufacturing tolerances may indeed be at play here, as may be simply the passage of time. I agree the 44m is sharper, but I never managed to get quite as nice an image as I did from the (KMZ) 44 or 44-2 lenses. Maybe I got a bad one.

  • @purpleeinstein
    @purpleeinstein 2 дні тому

    For a split second, I thought Ozzy started a photography channel! As always, just love the content and your knowledgeable postulations Zen. Keep up the good work!

  • @Warrior_Resisting_Colonialism

    You look a bit like Ozzy, with your hair down.

  • @caw25sha
    @caw25sha 2 дні тому

    Is this video supposed to be called Untitled?

    • @Steve-GM0HUU
      @Steve-GM0HUU 2 дні тому

      I decided to choose my own title, "Lens I found in the back of a drawer"?

    • @zenography7923
      @zenography7923 День тому

      Whoops!

  • @wendysburgers4326
    @wendysburgers4326 2 дні тому

    Jena Flektogon has 3 version 1st Gen - Flektogon Auto 2nd Gen - Electric MC Flektogon 3rd Gen - MC Flektogon

  • @Apachers
    @Apachers 2 дні тому

    Thanks for the review. I'm surprised by what you said about flare-resistance. In other review I had watched internal reflections were mentioned as a huge problem: ua-cam.com/video/82_Qw_rzDJw/v-deo.htmlsi=m-HGyFVGd1Up_Hpl&t=405. I must say, it is also consistent with my personal experience with some other TTartisan lenses (25mm/f2 particularly) - they all suffered from a substantial flare and an associated drop of contrast. They stil offer a very good value for money but it is something worth considering (or at least being aware of when making decision to purchase one).

  • @michaeld5888
    @michaeld5888 2 дні тому

    If nobody has mentioned this you can assign on the XS-10 fine zoom to the focus ring but need AF+MF disabled for it to work. Also on the XS-10 zoom level does return on switch on. These are more a body/firmware issues than with the lens itself.

  • @WoodyDemon6421win
    @WoodyDemon6421win 2 дні тому

    Zenography you truly are the poet of ‘Blur’ closely followed by your musings on colour. Pleased you’ve returned to your roots Vintage glass.

  • @chrisloomis1489
    @chrisloomis1489 2 дні тому

    Nigel: these are sharp , I have an MX-EVS with the 10 blade aperture , and she is a TESSAR 75mm 3.5 " honey " , your camera is beautiful compared to my 75 TESSAR , I need a tune up on mine also though the lenses are spectacular. My BIG Rollei is the 55mm F4 DISTAGON Wide Rollei , it is heavier , but my God ...that is a sharp gracious lens. Love ROLLEI ♥

  • @chrisloomis1489
    @chrisloomis1489 2 дні тому

    My God man ; head down into concrete , Damn ... that is rough but the hood took the blow and cushioned the rest of the body so that is good and finding the expert and servicing / parts incredible blessings. She is a sharp looking Rollei ♥

  • @therealwhite
    @therealwhite 3 дні тому

    Hi! Not a longtime watcher or anything, just wanted to say you look like the Home Alone kid as a grown fellow. Have a nice day

  • @sclogse1
    @sclogse1 3 дні тому

    With these two cameras, does it make a difference if you set the shutter speed before or after cranking the camera?

  • @carbonejack
    @carbonejack 3 дні тому

    I have the 3.5. When I got it, I just held it and stared at it. It was so beautiful and elegant. The craftsmanship and design are incredible. I need to use it more.

  • @henryrogers5500
    @henryrogers5500 3 дні тому

    Very nice informative video, as always! Thanks. I love my Olympus EM-10 Mark II mirrorless. You’re right. Olympus has outstanding color technology in their sensors! I also have the Sony a6100 mirrorless.

  • @kruno7150
    @kruno7150 4 дні тому

    28/06/2024 Vivitar 28mm f2 (22xxxxxx Kiron) - 15eur

  • @photofreaksk
    @photofreaksk 4 дні тому

    Finest vintage lenses ever made are Leica M39 and Leica M Lenses. Pre War Zeiss, MF Nikkors, Canon FD, Minolta Rokkors, Olympus OM Pentax M AP 67 Mamiya RB 67, etc are astonishing too. Zeiss Jena lenses are nice, but finest ever made? Come on...

  • @ashentemplar2477
    @ashentemplar2477 4 дні тому

    exacta ihagee dresden 1945-49 no608000-650000 ( ver 1.2.3 )

  • @lee111000
    @lee111000 5 днів тому

    all great videos, ive learnt allot , thankyou

  • @JamieByrne1977
    @JamieByrne1977 5 днів тому

    What a beautiful introduction.